Towards a semantics for the artifactual theory of fiction and beyond

Synthese 191 (3):499-516 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In her book Fiction and Metaphysics (1999) Amie Thomasson, influenced by the work of Roman Ingarden, develops a phenomenological approach to fictional entities in order to explain how non-fictional entities can be referred to intrafictionally and transfictionally, for example in the context of literary interpretation. As our starting point we take Thomasson’s realist theory of literary fictional objects, according to which such objects actually exist, albeit as abstract and artifactual entities. Thomasson’s approach relies heavily on the notion of ontological dependence, but its precise semantics has not yet been developed. Moreover, the modal approach to the notion of ontological dependence underlying the Artifactual Theory has recently been contested by several scholars. The main aims of this paper are (i) to develop a semantic approach to the notion of ontological dependence in the context of the Artifactual Theory of fiction, and in so doing bridge a number of philosophical and logical gaps; (ii) to generalize Thomasson’s categorial theory of ontological dependence by reconstructing ontological categories of entities purely in terms of different structures of ontological dependence, rather than in terms of the basic kinds of entities the categorical entities depend on

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,569

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Where is Sherlock Holmes?Jeffrey Goodman - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):183-197.
Fictional Characters and Literary Practices.Amie L. Thomasson - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):138-157.
Substance and Independence in Aristotle.Phil Corkum - 2013 - In B. Schnieder, A. Steinberg & M. Hoeltje (eds.), Varieties of Dependence: Ontological Dependence, Supervenience, and Response-Dependence. Basic Philosophical Concepts Series, Philosophia Verlag. pp. 36-67.
Natural and Artifactual: Restored Nature as Subject.Yeuk-sze Lo - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (3):247-266.
Ontological Dependence.Fabrice Correia - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1013-1032.
Ontological Minimalism.Amie Thomasson - 2001 - American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (4):319 - 331.
Fiction's Ontological Commitments.Christopher Mole - 2009 - Philosophical Forum 40 (4):473-488.
Aristotle on Ontological Dependence.Phil Corkum - 2008 - Phronesis 53 (1):65 - 92.
Voltolini's Ficta.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2009 - Dialectica 63 (1):57-66.
Spheres of Being and the Network of Ontological Dependencies.Roberto Poli - 2010 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):171-182.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-17

Downloads
122 (#101,029)

6 months
1 (#418,511)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Shahid Rahman
Université Charles-de-Gaulle - Lille 3
Matthieu Fontaine
Universidade de Lisboa

References found in this work

Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.Gideon Rosen - 2010 - In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 109-135.
On What Grounds What.Jonathan Schaffer - 2009 - In David Manley, David J. Chalmers & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 347-383.
Parts: A Study in Ontology.Peter Simons - 1987 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 39 references / Add more references