Synthese 191 (3):499-516 (2014)

Authors
Shahid Rahman
Université Charles-de-Gaulle - Lille 3
Matthieu Fontaine
Universidade de Lisboa
Abstract
In her book Fiction and Metaphysics (1999) Amie Thomasson, influenced by the work of Roman Ingarden, develops a phenomenological approach to fictional entities in order to explain how non-fictional entities can be referred to intrafictionally and transfictionally, for example in the context of literary interpretation. As our starting point we take Thomasson’s realist theory of literary fictional objects, according to which such objects actually exist, albeit as abstract and artifactual entities. Thomasson’s approach relies heavily on the notion of ontological dependence, but its precise semantics has not yet been developed. Moreover, the modal approach to the notion of ontological dependence underlying the Artifactual Theory has recently been contested by several scholars. The main aims of this paper are (i) to develop a semantic approach to the notion of ontological dependence in the context of the Artifactual Theory of fiction, and in so doing bridge a number of philosophical and logical gaps; (ii) to generalize Thomasson’s categorial theory of ontological dependence by reconstructing ontological categories of entities purely in terms of different structures of ontological dependence, rather than in terms of the basic kinds of entities the categorical entities depend on
Keywords Artifactual theory  Ontological dependence  Fiction  Non-existence
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-013-0287-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,447
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Harvard University Press.
Parts: A Study in Ontology.Peter Simons - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
Naming and Necessity.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 431-433.
Is Metaphysical Dependence Irreflexive?C. Jenkins - 2011 - The Monist 94 (2):267-276.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Where is Sherlock Holmes?Jeffrey Goodman - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):183-197.
Fictional Characters and Literary Practices.Amie L. Thomasson - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):138-157.
Substance and Independence in Aristotle.Phil Corkum - 2013 - In B. Schnieder, A. Steinberg & M. Hoeltje (eds.), Varieties of Dependence: Ontological Dependence, Supervenience, and Response-Dependence. Basic Philosophical Concepts Series, Philosophia Verlag. pp. 36-67.
Natural and Artifactual.Yeuk-Sze Lo - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (3):247-266.
Ontological Dependence.Fabrice Correia - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1013-1032.
Ontological Minimalism.Amie Thomasson - 2001 - American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (4):319 - 331.
Fiction's Ontological Commitments.Christopher Mole - 2009 - Philosophical Forum 40 (4):473-488.
Aristotle on Ontological Dependence.Phil Corkum - 2008 - Phronesis 53 (1):65 - 92.
Voltolini's Ficta.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2009 - Dialectica 63 (1):57-66.
Spheres of Being and the Network of Ontological Dependencies.Roberto Poli - 2010 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):171-182.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-05-17

Total views
111 ( #80,929 of 2,326,389 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #104,722 of 2,326,389 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes