Authors
Rainer Forst
Goethe University Frankfurt
Abstract
This article analyses the debate between Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth in a dialectical fashion. Their controversy about how to construct a critical theory of justice is not just one about the proper balance between `redistribution' and `recognition', it also involves basic questions of social ontology. Differing both from Fraser's `twodimensional' view of `participatory parity' and from Honneth's `monistic' theory of recognition, the article argues for a third view of `justificatory monism and diagnosticevaluative pluralism', also called the `first-things-first' approach. According to it, theories of recognition provide an essential sensorium for analyses of social suffering and of injustice, while with respect to the justification of justice claims, a discursive conception of justification is required. This, however, does not imply a purely `formal' account of justice; rather, it leads to a substantive understanding of the `grammar of justice', motivationally, socially and institutionally. Such an account of a critical theory of justice aims at a multidimensional critique of social and political `relations of justification'.
Keywords Critical Theory  Nancy Fraser  Axel Honneth  Justice  Justification  Power  Recognition
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1474885107077318
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,323
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Being Oneself in Another: Recognition and the Culturalist Deformation of Identity.Radu Neculau - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (2):148-170.
Europe, Crisis, and Critique: Social Theory and Transnational Society.Patrick O’Mahony - 2014 - European Journal of Social Theory 17 (3):238-257.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

All Things Must Pass Away.Joshua Spencer - 2012 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 7:67.
Thing and Object.Kristie Miller - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (1):69-89.
Theories and Things.W. V. O. Quine (ed.) - 1981 - Harvard University Press.
‘All Things Considered’.Ruth Chang - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):1–22.
How is the Arrival of Things Possible?Hua’nan Gong - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (3):389-408.
Desire.Philip Pettit - 1998 - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Kant's Appearances and Things in Themselves as Qua‐Objects.Colin Marshall - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (252):520-545.
The Things Things Say.Jonathan Lamb - 2011 - Princeton University Press.
Making Things Up.Karen Bennett - 2017 - Oxford University Press.
Causality and Things in Themselves.Kent Baldner - 1988 - Synthese 77 (3):353 - 373.
Projection.Arthur Child - 1967 - Philosophy 42 (159):20 - 36.
What Things Still Don’T Do. [REVIEW]David M. Kaplan - 2009 - Human Studies 32 (2):229 - 240.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
70 ( #152,831 of 2,448,716 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #301,447 of 2,448,716 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes