International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (3):117 - 133 (2008)
It is often said that the ontological argument fails because it wrongly treats existence as a first-level property or predicate. This has proved a controversial claim, and efforts to evaluate it are complicated by the fact that the words ‘existence is not a property/predicate’ have been used by philosophers to make at least three different negative claims: (a) one about a first-level phenomenon possessed by objects like horses, stones, you and me; (b) another about the logical form of assertions of existence; and (c) still another about a second-level phenomenon possessed by concepts when they are instantiated. I argue that only the last of these claims, originally voiced by Kant, is both plausible and relevant to the ontological argument. And I try to show that the relevance of the Kantian version comes from its providing the underlying justification for a different, and far less controversial, criticism of the ontological argument.
|Keywords||God Ontological argument Existence Predicates Gassendi Kant Caterus objection|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Religion, Philosophy, and Psychical Research : Selected Essays / Charlie Broad.Charlie Dunbar Broad - 1953 - Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Leibniz, Kant and Frege on the Existence Predicate.Brandon C. Look - 2011 - In H. Breger, J. Herbst & S. Erdner (eds.), Natur und Subjekt: Akten des IX. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses. Hartmann.
Thought Experimenting with God. Revisiting the Ontological Argument.Yiftach J. H. Fehige - 2009 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 51 (3):249-267.
Alvin Plantinga on the Ontological Argument.William L. Rowe - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):87 - 92.
The Ontological Argument and the Devil.Yujin Nagasawa - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):72-91.
Gassendi and Kant on Existence.William Forgie - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (4):511 - 523.
The Relevance of Kant's Objection to Anselm's Ontological Argument.Chris Heathwood - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (3):345-357.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads108 ( #45,648 of 2,164,542 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,058 of 2,164,542 )
How can I increase my downloads?