Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three ‘Critiques’ and the ‘Opus Postumum’

Stanford University Press (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A Stanford University Press classic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant's final synthesis: an essay on the Opus postumum.Eckart Förster - 2000 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Beauty, systematicity, and the highest good: Eckart Förster's Kant's final synthesis.Paul Guyer - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):195 – 214.
Kant's Opus Postumum and McDowell's Critique of Kant.Martin Shuster - 2014 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (4):427-444.
Fichte, Beck and Schelling in Kant's opus postumum.Eckart Förster - 1990 - In G. MacDonald Ross & Tony McWalter (eds.), Kant and His Influence. Thoemmes Continuum. pp. 146.
Eckart förster and Kant's opus postumum.Michael Friedman - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):215 – 227.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-20

Downloads
61 (#259,066)

6 months
16 (#149,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eckart Förster
Humboldt-University, Berlin

Citations of this work

The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology.Herman Cappelen, Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Kant’s Deduction and Apperception: Explaining the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - London and Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Innate right in Kant—A critical reading.Katrin Flikschuh - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):823-839.
Kant on analogy.John J. Callanan - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (4):747 – 772.

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references