Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5):875-892 (2014)

Authors
Paul Formosa
Macquarie University
Catriona Mackenzie
Macquarie University
Abstract
The concept of dignity plays a foundational role in the more recent versions of Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities theory. However, despite its centrality to her theory, Nussbaum’s conception of dignity remains under-theorised. In this paper we critically examine the role that dignity plays in Nussbaum’s theory by, first, developing an account of the concept of dignity and introducing a distinction between two types of dignity, status dignity and achievement dignity. Next, drawing on this account, we analyse Nussbaum’s conception of dignity and contrast it with Kant’s conception of dignity. On the basis of this comparison between Nussbaum and Kant, we highlight tensions between Nussbaum’s Aristotelianism, which is central to her conception of dignity, and her commitment to political liberalism. This leads us to conclude that Nussbaum’s claim that her conception of dignity is only a partial political conception is implausible and that her conception of dignity seems to commit her to a satisficing form of perfectionist liberalism
Keywords Dignity  Capabilities Approach  Nussbaum  Kant  Political Liberalism  Perfectionism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-014-9487-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
The Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1797/1996 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Kantian Ethics, Dignity and Perfection.Paul Formosa - 2017 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
"Reconsidering Dignity Relationally".Sarah Clark Miller - 2017 - Ethics and Social Welfare 11 (2):108-121.
An Agency‐Based Capability Theory of Justice.Rutger Claassen - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):1279-1304.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant's Conception of Human Dignity.Oliver Sensen - 2009 - Kant Studien 100 (3):309-331.
Virtue Ethics in Business and the Capabilities Approach.Alexander Bertland - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 84 (S1):25 - 32.
Dignity, Honour, and Human Rights: Kant's Perspective.Rachel Bayefsky - 2013 - Political Theory 41 (6):0090591713499762.
Shame on You, Shame on Me? Nussbaum on Shame Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (4):322-334.
By.Craig Duncan - manuscript
Undignified Bioethics.Alasdair Cochrane - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (5):234-241.
Human Rights and Human Dignity: An Appeal to Separate the Conjoined Twins.Doris Schroeder - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3):323 - 335.
Dignity as a Moral Concept.Colin Bird - 2013 - Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2):150-176.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-23

Total views
419 ( #24,277 of 2,533,478 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
84 ( #8,775 of 2,533,478 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes