Philosophical Topics 44 (1):141-161 (2016)

Anton Ford
University of Chicago
The conclusion of practical reasoning is commonly said to rest upon a diverse pair of representations—a “major” and a “minor” premise—the first of which concerns the end and the second, the means. Modern and contemporary philosophers writing on action and practical reasoning tend to portray the minor premise as a “means-end belief”—a belief about, as Michael Smith puts it, “the ways in which one thing leads to another,” or, as John McDowell puts it, “what can be relied on to bring about what.” On this point there is little difference between followers of Davidson and followers of Anscombe, or between those who invoke Hume’s legacy and those who invoke Aristotle’s. But Aristotle himself held a very different position. According to him, the minor premise concerns particulars, a sphere controlled by perception. The perception of particulars—that is, of the really-existing people and things confronted in the field of action—plays no essential role in the modern account of rational agency. Because it does not, the modern account fails to explain how one could act for a reason, or how practical reasoning could deliver any conclusion.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  General Interest  Philosophy of Mind
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0276-2080
DOI 10.5840/philtopics20164419
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,593
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Intention.Kieran Setiya - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Two Puzzles About Ability Can.Malte Willer - 2021 - Linguistics and Philosophy 44 (3):551-586.
The Representation of Action.Anton Ford - 2017 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 80:217-233.
The Instrumental Rule.Jeremy David Fix - 2020 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 6 (4):444-462.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Praktische Wahrnehmung.Anton Ford - 2013 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 61 (3):403-418.
Pleasure in Practical Reasoning.Elijah Millgram - 1993 - The Monist 76 (3):394-415.
Epistemic Reasoning and the Mental.Mikkel Gerken - 2013 - Palgrave Macmillan (Innovations in Philosophy).
A Contrast Between Two Pictures.Jennifer Hornsby - 2016 - Philosophical Topics 44 (1):127-139.
Situating Experience: Agency, Perception, and the Given.Matthew Burstein - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (1):1-29.
Practical Reasoning.Bart Streumer - 2010 - In Timothy O'Connor & Constantine Sandis (eds.), Blackwell Companion to the Philosophy of Action. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 244-251.
Davidson on Practical Knowledge.David Hunter - 2015 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 3 (9).
Theoretical Anarchism.Benjamin McMyler - 2014 - Philosophical Topics 42 (1):219-242.


Added to PP index

Total views
108 ( #102,754 of 2,462,111 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #53,156 of 2,462,111 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes