Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1023-1034 (2018)

Authors
Bert Heinrichs
Universität Bonn
Matthias Kaiser
University of Bergen
Abstract
This document presents the Bonn PRINTEGER Consensus Statement: Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for research performing organisations. The aim of the statement is to complement existing instruments by focusing specifically on institutional responsibilities for strengthening integrity. It takes into account the daily challenges and organisational contexts of most researchers. The statement intends to make research integrity challenges recognisable from the work-floor perspective, providing concrete advice on organisational measures to strengthen integrity. The statement, which was concluded February 7th 2018, provides guidance on the following key issues: § 1.Providing information about research integrity § 2.Providing education, training and mentoring § 3.Strengthening a research integrity culture § 4.Facilitating open dialogue § 5.Wise incentive management § 6.Implementing quality assurance procedures § 7.Improving the work environment and work satisfaction § 8.Increasing transparency of misconduct cases § 9.Opening up research § 10.Implementing safe and effective whistle-blowing channels § 11.Protecting the alleged perpetrators § 12.Establishing a research integrity committee and appointing an ombudsperson § 13.Making explicit the applicable standards for research integrity
Keywords research integrity
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-018-0034-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity.Lex Bouter - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):2363-2369.
Professionalism in Science: Competence, Autonomy, and Service.Hugh Desmond - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1287-1313.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Quest for Clarity in Research Integrity: A Conceptual Schema.David Shaw - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (4):1085-1093.
Integrity in Postgraduate Research: The Student Voice.Saadia Mahmud & Tracey Bretag - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (6):1657-1672.
The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research.Jan Winter & Laszlo Kosolosky - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):757-774.
The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research.Jan De Winter & Laszlo Kosolosky - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):757-774.
On the Notion of Organisational Integrity.Wim Vandekerckhove - 2010 - Philosophy of Management 9 (1):123-134.
Business Ethics in the Netherlands: A Survey.Muel Kaptein - 2003 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 12 (2):172-178.
Business Ethics in the Netherlands: A Survey.Muel Kaptein - 2003 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 12 (2):172–178.
Honest Research.Dr Harold Hillman - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):49-58.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-05-31

Total views
64 ( #159,844 of 2,427,678 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #47,859 of 2,427,678 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes