Agonistic Critiques of Liberalism: Perfection and Emancipation

Contemporary Political Theory 7 (4):376–394 (2008)
Abstract
Agonism is a political theory that places contestation at the heart of politics. Agonistic theorists charge liberal theory with a depoliticization of pluralism through an excessive focus on consensus. This paper examines the agonistic critiques of liberalism from a normative perspective. I argue that by itself the argument from pluralism is not sufficient to support an agonistic account of politics, but points to further normative commitments. Analyzing the work of Mouffe, Honig, Connolly, and Owen, I identify two normative currents of agonistic theory: emancipatory agonism, aimed at challenging violence and exclusion, and perfectionist agonism, aimed at the cultivation of nobility. From a normative perspective the former presents an internal challenge to liberalism, while the latter constitutes an external challenge to liberalism by providing a competing account of the ends of politics. Recognition of the distinction between emancipatory and perfectionist agonism is crucial in assessing the purchase of agonistic critiques of liberalism. Furthermore, this analysis draws us beyond the simple opposition between contestation and consensus. It is not simply a question of valuing genuine pluralism and therefore criticizing consensus; rather the question comes to be: what are the ends of politics?
Keywords agonism  liberalism  emancipation  perfectionism  pluralism  contestation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI doi:10.1057/cpt.2008.15
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Political Philosophy As a Critical Activity.J. Tully - 2002 - Political Theory 30 (4):533-555.
Agonism in Divided Societies.Andrew Schaap - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):255-277.
Debate: Agonism as Deliberation – on Mouffe's Theory of Democracy.Andrew Knops - 2007 - Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (1):115–126.
Law and Disagreement.Arthur Ripstein & Jeremy Waldron - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (4):611.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Agonism and Pluralism.Monique Deveaux - 1999 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (4):1-22.
Liberalism, Perfectionism, and Civic Virtue.Herlinde Pauer-studer - 2001 - Philosophical Explorations 4 (3):174 – 192.
Agonism in Divided Societies.Andrew Schaap - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):255-277.
The Opening : Alegality and Political Agonism.Hans Lindahl - 2008 - In Andrew Schaap (ed.), Law and Agonistic Politics. Ashgate Pub. Company.
Agonism, Antagonism and the Necessity of Care.Keith Breen - 2008 - In Andrew Schaap (ed.), Law and Agonistic Politics. Ashgate Pub. Company.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-10-20

Total downloads

547 ( #2,773 of 2,163,689 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

96 ( #1,435 of 2,163,689 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums