American Journal of Bioethics 8 (8):44 – 48 (2008)

This article reviews the use of implantable radiofrequency identification (RFID) tags in humans, focusing on the VeriChip (VeriChip Corporation, Delray Beach, FL) and the associated VeriMed patient identification system. In addition, various nonmedical applications for implanted RFID tags in humans have been proposed. The technology offers important health and nonhealth benefits, but raises ethical concerns, including privacy and the potential for coercive implantation of RFID tags in individuals. A national discussion is needed to identify the limits of acceptable use of implantable RFID tags in humans before their use becomes widespread and it becomes too late to prevent misuse of this useful but ethically problematic technology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15265160802317966
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,981
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Implantable Tags: Don't Close the Door for Aunt Millie!Alistair Niemeijer & Cees Hertogh - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (8):50 – 52.
Ethics and Indemnification Regarding the Verichip.Virginia Ashby Sharpe - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (8):49 – 50.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
132 ( #76,141 of 2,427,432 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #533,878 of 2,427,432 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes