Game theory for reformation of behavioral science based on a mistake

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):24-25 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gintis assumes the behavioral (=social) sciences are in disarray, and so proposes a theory for their unification. Examination of the unity of the physical sciences reveals he misunderstands the unity of science in general, and so fails to see that the social sciences are already unified with the physical sciences. Another explanation of the differences between them is outlined. (Published Online April 27 2007).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,462

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The place of ethics in a unified behavioral science.Peter Danielson - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):23-24.
Do the cognitive and behavioral sciences need each other?David W. Gow Jr - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):27-28.
Against the unification of the behavioral sciences.Steve Clarke - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):21-22.
The limitations of unification.Arthur B. Markman - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):33-34.
Evolutionary theory and the social sciences.Robert L. Burgess & Peter C. M. Molenaar - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):20-21.
More obstacles on the road to unification.Eric Alden Smith - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):41-41.
The flight from reasoning in psychology.Joachim I. Krueger - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):32-33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
51 (#347,688)

6 months
5 (#896,806)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references