How must relativism be construed to be coherent?

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (1):55-75 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay attempts to clarify certain notions that the author finds useful for the discussion of relativism and then to show what kinds of relativism about values, rationality, and truth are and are not coherent.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Attribution and Explanation in Relativism.Gurpreet Rattan - 2024 - Philosophical Quarterly 74 (3):1016-1025.
Relativism.Paul O'Grady - 2002 - Chesham, Bucks [England]: Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
Three Kinds of Relativism.Paul Boghossian - 2011 - In Steven D. Hales (ed.), A Companion to Relativism. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 53–69.
Relativism, standards and aesthetic judgements.James O. Young - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):221 – 231.
Relativism, and Social Theory.".On Relativity - 1986 - In Joseph Margolis, Michael Krausz & Richard M. Burian (eds.), Rationality, Relativism, and the Human Sciences. M. Nijhoff. pp. 209--22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
50 (#326,694)

6 months
3 (#1,045,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (I).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95-123.
Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (II).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):223-262.
Popper'sobjective knowledge1.Paul Feyerabend - 1974 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 17 (1-4):475-507.

View all 9 references / Add more references