Authors
Ameer Sarwar
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
Abstract
The current formulation of the zeroth law (the law of compatibility) is marred with a number of theoretical problems, which necessitate its reformulation. In this paper, we propose that compatibility is an independent stance that can be taken towards epistemic elements of all types. We then provide a new definition of compatibility criteria to reflect this change. We show that the content of the zeroth law is deducible from our definition of compatibility. Instead of a static law of compatibility, we propose a new dynamic law of compatibility that explains how the stance of compatibility obtains. Unlike the zeroth law, this new law has empirical content, as it forbids certain conceivable scenarios. Having established these notions, we propose a classification space that exhaustively covers all the possible states a theory may occupy and all the transitions it may undergo during its lifecycle.
Keywords theoretical scientonomy  compatibility  compatibility criteria  the zeroth law  the law of compatibility  demarcation-acceptance synchronism  theory rejection  classification of theory change
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Scientificity and The Law of Theory Demarcation.Ameer Sarwar & Patrick Fraser - 2018 - Scientonomy: Journal for the Science of Science 2:55-66.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

About the Sense of Social Compatibility.Karin Bohmann - 1989 - AI and Society 3 (4):323-331.
Are Ninian Smart's Temptations Irresistible?Antony Flew - 1962 - Philosophy 37 (139):57 - 60.
Scientificity and The Law of Theory Demarcation.Ameer Sarwar & Patrick Fraser - 2018 - Scientonomy: Journal for the Science of Science 2:55-66.
On Compatibility in Quantum Logics.J. Brabec & P. Pták - 1982 - Foundations of Physics 12 (2):207-212.
S-R Compatibility and Information Reduction.Paul M. Fitts & Irving Biederman - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (4):408.
Hating the One You Love.Aaron Ben-Ze’ev - 2008 - Philosophia 36 (3):277-283.
S-R Compatibility and the Idea of a Response Code.Richard J. Wallace - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (3):354.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-12-21

Total views
40 ( #236,465 of 2,330,100 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #26,967 of 2,330,100 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes