Adaptation, Exaptation, By-Products and Spandrels in Evolutionary Explanations of Morality

Biological Theory 5 (3):223-227 (2010)
Abstract
Adaptationist accounts of morality attempt to explain the evolution of morality in terms of the selective advantage that judging in moral terms secured for our ancestors (e.g. Ruse 1998; Joyce 2006; Street 2006). So-called by-product explanations of morality have been presented as an alternative to adaptationist accounts (e.g. Prinz 2009; Ayala 2010; cf. Darwin 2004/1871). In assessing the relationship between adaptationist and by-product accounts, care must be taken to distinguish several related but importantly different notions: innateness, adaptation, exaptation, spandrel, and by-product.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1162/BIOT_a_00052
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,208
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
What is Innateness?Paul Griffiths - 2002 - The Monist 85 (1):70-85.
Darwinian Ethics and Error.R. Joyce - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (5):713-732.
Can Moral Obligations Be Empirically Discovered?Jesse J. Prinz - 2007 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31 (1):271-291.
Acquired Moral Truths. [REVIEW]Jesse Prinz - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1):219-227.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Rescuing Tracking Theories of Morality.Marc Artiga - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (12):3357-3374.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Lack of Evidentiary Criteria for Exaptations?James L. Dannemiller - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):512-513.
It's Adaptations All the Way Down.M. D. Rutherford - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):526-526.
San Marco and Evolutionary Biology.Alasdair I. Houston - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (2):215-230.
How to Pursue the Adaptationist Program in Psychology.Russil Durrant & Brian D. Haig - 2001 - Philosophical Psychology 14 (4):357 – 380.
Adaptation and Moral Realism.William F. Harms - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (5):699-712.
When Evolutionary Game Theory Explains Morality, What Does It Explain?Justin D'arms - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (1-2):296-299.
Adaptation for, Exaptation As.Nicholas S. Thompson - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):531-532.
Biological Levers and Extended Adaptationism.Gillian Barker - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (1):1-25.
The Fuzzy Zone Between Exaptation and Phenotypic Adaptation.Eric Alden Smith - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):529-530.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-09-26

Total downloads

92 ( #56,468 of 2,172,801 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #75,736 of 2,172,801 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums