A note on 'knowledge, certainty, and probability'∗

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):417-417 (1964)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In ?Knowledge, Certainty and Probability?, Dr. Heidelberger claims to have shown ?that it is a mistake to assimilate probability and rational belief to knowledge?. The conclusion may be true but his argument is faulty

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/00201746408601417

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Seeing, certainty and apprehension.Kevin Mulligan - unknown
Reasons, knowledge, and probability.Fred I. Dretske - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (2):216-220.
Conditionalizing on knowledge.Timothy Williamson - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):89-121.
The probability of conditionals: The psychological evidence.David E. Over & Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2003 - Mind and Language 18 (4):340–358.
Hume on knowledge, certainty and probability: Anticipating the disintegration of the analytic/synthetic divide?Kevin Meeker - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (2):226–242.
Hume's skeptical crisis: a textual study.Robert J. Fogelin - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Why Certainty is Not a Mansion.Elly Vintiadis - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Research 31:143-152.
Knowledge, certainty and probability.Herbert Heidelberger - 1963 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):242 – 250.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
15 (#926,042)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references