I say that it’s philosophically inexpensive because I think it is more convincing than any other Twin-Earth thought experiment in that it sidesteps many of the standard objections to the usual thought experiments. I also discuss narrow contents and give an analysis of Putnam’s original argument.
|Keywords||twin-earth Burge Putnam externalism narrow content anti-individualism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Components of Content (Revised Version).David J. Chalmers - 2002 - In Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oup Usa.
Twin-Earth Externalism and Concept Possession.Derek Ball - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):457-472.
Does Twin Earth Rest on a Mistake?Katalin Farkas - 2003 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (8):155-169.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads161 ( #28,313 of 2,158,880 )
Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #19,749 of 2,158,880 )
How can I increase my downloads?