Authors
Abstract
I say that it’s philosophically inexpensive because I think it is more convincing than any other Twin-Earth thought experiment in that it sidesteps many of the standard objections to the usual thought experiments. I also discuss narrow contents and give an analysis of Putnam’s original argument.
Keywords twin-earth  Burge  Putnam  externalism  narrow content  anti-individualism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Does Twin Earth Rest on a Mistake?Katalin Farkas - 2003 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (8):155-169.
Twin-Earth Externalism and Concept Possession.Derek Ball - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):457-472.
Moore on Twin Earth.Neil Levy - 2011 - Erkenntnis 75 (1):137-146.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
282 ( #27,660 of 2,381,244 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #37,802 of 2,381,244 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes