Distinctions, Judgment, and Reasoning in Classical Chinese Thought
History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (1):1-24 (2013)
Authors |
Chris Fraser
University of Hong Kong
|
Abstract |
The article proposes an account of the prevailing classical Chinese conception of reasoning and argumentation that grounds it in a semantic theory and epistemology centered on drawing distinctions between the similar and dissimilar kinds of things that do or do not fall within the extension of ‘names’. The article presents two novel interpretive hypotheses. First, for pre-Hàn Chinese thinkers, the functional role associated with the logical copula is filled by a general notion of similarity or sameness. Second, these thinkers’ basic explanation of reasoning is that it is a process of moving from a comparison of whether something is similar to a ‘model’ or ‘standard’ to a judgment about whether that thing is part of a certain kind. Classical texts treat judgment as the attitude of predicating a ‘name’ of something, or, equivalently, of distinguishing whether something is the kind of thing denoted by a certain term. Reasoning is treated as a process of considering how some acts of term predication, or drawing distinctions, normatively commit one to making further, analogous predications or drawing further, analogous distinctions. Inference is thus understood as the act of distinguishing something as a certain kind of thing as a result of having distinguished it as similar to a relevant ‘model’ or ‘standard’. The article concludes by summarizing the consequences of the proposed account of early Chinese semantic and logical theories for the interpretation of other areas of classical Chinese thought.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1080/01445340.2012.724927 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Later Mohist Logic, Ethics, and Science.A. C. Graham - 1978 - School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
View all 24 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Ways of Doing Cross-Cultural Philosophy.Koji Tanaka - 2016 - In John Makeham (ed.), Learning from the Other: Australian and Chinese Perspectives on Philosophy. Canberra: Australian Academy of the Humanities. pp. 59-65.
Similar books and articles
Similarity and Standards : Language, Cognition, and Action in Chinese and Western Thought.Christopher J. Fraser - unknown
Knowledge and Error in Early Chinese Thought.Chris Fraser - 2011 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (2):127-148.
The Role of Time in the Structure of Chinese Logic.Jinmei Yuan - 2006 - Philosophy East and West 56 (1):136-152.
Form, Principle, Pattern, or Coherence? Li in Chinese Philosophy.Brook Ziporyn - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (3):401–422.
The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail.Jonathan Haidt - 2001 - Psychological Review 108 (4):814-834.
Weakness of Will, the Background, and Chinese Thought.Kai-Yee Wong & Chris Fraser - 2008 - In Bo Mou (ed.), Searle’s Philosophy and Chinese Philosophy: Constructive Engagemen. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers. pp. 313-333.
Language and Ontology in Early Chinese Thought.Chris Fraser - 2007 - Philosophy East and West 57 (4):420-456.
A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation.Chad Hansen - 1992 - Oxford University Press.
Neiwai, Civility, and Gender Distinctions.Li‐Hsiang Lisa Rosenlee - 2004 - Asian Philosophy 14 (1):41 – 58.
Proposition, Definition and Inference in Ancient Chinese Philosophy.Ningzhong Shi - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):414-431.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-11-09
Total views
60 ( #140,353 of 2,273,199 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #202,512 of 2,273,199 )
2012-11-09
Total views
60 ( #140,353 of 2,273,199 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #202,512 of 2,273,199 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads