Distinctions, Judgment, and Reasoning in Classical Chinese Thought

History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (1):1-24 (2013)

Authors
Chris Fraser
University of Hong Kong
Abstract
The article proposes an account of the prevailing classical Chinese conception of reasoning and argumentation that grounds it in a semantic theory and epistemology centered on drawing distinctions between the similar and dissimilar kinds of things that do or do not fall within the extension of ‘names’. The article presents two novel interpretive hypotheses. First, for pre-Hàn Chinese thinkers, the functional role associated with the logical copula is filled by a general notion of similarity or sameness. Second, these thinkers’ basic explanation of reasoning is that it is a process of moving from a comparison of whether something is similar to a ‘model’ or ‘standard’ to a judgment about whether that thing is part of a certain kind. Classical texts treat judgment as the attitude of predicating a ‘name’ of something, or, equivalently, of distinguishing whether something is the kind of thing denoted by a certain term. Reasoning is treated as a process of considering how some acts of term predication, or drawing distinctions, normatively commit one to making further, analogous predications or drawing further, analogous distinctions. Inference is thus understood as the act of distinguishing something as a certain kind of thing as a result of having distinguished it as similar to a relevant ‘model’ or ‘standard’. The article concludes by summarizing the consequences of the proposed account of early Chinese semantic and logical theories for the interpretation of other areas of classical Chinese thought.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/01445340.2012.724927
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,462
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Inference and Meaning.Wilfrid Sellars - 1953 - Mind 62 (247):313-338.
Language and Logic in Ancient China.Chad Hansen - 1983 - University of Michigan Press.
Confucius: The Secular as Sacred.Herbert Fingarette - 1974 - Religious Studies 10 (2):245-246.
Later Mohist Logic, Ethics, and Science.A. C. Graham - 1978 - School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ways of Doing Cross-Cultural Philosophy.Koji Tanaka - 2016 - In John Makeham (ed.), Learning from the Other: Australian and Chinese Perspectives on Philosophy. Canberra: Australian Academy of the Humanities. pp. 59-65.
Classical Chinese Logic.Jana S. Rošker - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (5):301-309.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Knowledge and Error in Early Chinese Thought.Chris Fraser - 2011 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (2):127-148.
The Role of Time in the Structure of Chinese Logic.Jinmei Yuan - 2006 - Philosophy East and West 56 (1):136-152.
The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail.Jonathan Haidt - 2001 - Psychological Review 108 (4):814-834.
Language and Ontology in Early Chinese Thought.Chris Fraser - 2007 - Philosophy East and West 57 (4):420-456.
Proposition, Definition and Inference in Ancient Chinese Philosophy.Ningzhong Shi - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):414-431.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-11-09

Total views
60 ( #140,353 of 2,273,199 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #202,512 of 2,273,199 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature