Defending the defense

Mind 108 (431):563-566 (1999)
My hunch has always been that in the end, Fregeanism will defeat Millianism. So I suspect that my (1998) arguments on behalf of Millianism are flawed. Peter Graham (1999) is confident he has found the flaws, but he has not. I hope that some clarification will encourage others to reveal the errors.
Keywords Millianism  Frege's puzzle  Kripke's puzzle  substitutivity  context
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/108.431.563
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Absolutism Vs. Relativism in Contemporary Ontology.Robert F. Allen - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:343-352.
Defending Millian Theories.Bryan Frances - 1998 - Mind 107 (428):703-728.
Puzzles on Defending Others From Aggression.Eduardo Rivera-López - 2005 - Law and Philosophy 25 (3):377-386.
A Pragmatic Defense of Millianism.Arvid Båve - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (2):271 - 289.
Defending Anarchy: Robert Paul Wolffs in Defense of Anarchism.Haime Marantz - 2002 - Radical Philosophy Review 5 (1/2):193-199.
Beyond Millianism.Leo Iacono - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (3):423 - 436.
Defending Millianism.Peter J. Graham - 1999 - Mind 108 (431):555-561.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

157 ( #29,383 of 2,163,617 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

30 ( #10,832 of 2,163,617 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums