Mind 108 (431):563-566 (1999)
My hunch has always been that in the end, Fregeanism will defeat Millianism. So I suspect that my (1998) arguments on behalf of Millianism are flawed. Peter Graham (1999) is confident he has found the flaws, but he has not. I hope that some clarification will encourage others to reveal the errors.
|Keywords||Millianism Frege's puzzle Kripke's puzzle substitutivity context|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Absolutism Vs. Relativism in Contemporary Ontology.Robert F. Allen - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:343-352.
Puzzles on Defending Others From Aggression.Eduardo Rivera-López - 2005 - Law and Philosophy 25 (3):377-386.
Defending Abortion Philosophically: A Review of David Boonin's a Defense of Abortion. [REVIEW]Francis J. Beckwith - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (2):177 – 203.
Materialism: Matters of Definition, Defense, and Deconstruction.Terence E. Horgan - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 131 (1):157-83.
Defending Anarchy: Robert Paul Wolffs in Defense of Anarchism.Haime Marantz - 2002 - Radical Philosophy Review 5 (1/2):193-199.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads157 ( #29,383 of 2,163,617 )
Recent downloads (6 months)30 ( #10,832 of 2,163,617 )
How can I increase my downloads?