Inheritable Genetic Modification and a Brave New World: Did Huxley Have It Wrong?

Hastings Center Report 33 (2):31-36 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What makes inheritable genetic modification attractive is not its ability to treat disease, but its capacity, someday, to enhance human traits beyond what mere good health requires. But, these discoveries will not be imposed on us by government, as Huxley thought. If they take over our lives, it will be because they were sold to us on the open market, as commodities we cannot do without.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Genetic modification and genetic determinism.David B. Resnik & Daniel B. Vorhaus - 2006 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 1:9.
Brave new world. Huxley - 2006 - In Thomas L. Cooksey (ed.), Masterpieces of Philosophical Literature. Greenwood Press.
What's Wrong with Walden Two?P. A. Tabensky - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (1):1-12.
Shaping individuality: Human inheritable germ line Gene modification.Maurizio Salvi - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (6):527-542.
The Disappearance of Art: The Postmodernism Debate in the U.S.Christa Bürger - 1986 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1986 (68):93-106.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
163 (#113,170)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references