Language and ontology in early chinese thought

Philosophy East and West 57 (4):420-456 (2007)
Abstract
: This essay critiques Chad Hansen’s "mass noun hypothesis," arguing that though most Classical Chinese nouns do function as mass nouns, this fact does not support the claim that pre-Qin thinkers treat the extensions of common nouns as mereological wholes, nor does it explain why they adopt nominalist semantic theories. The essay shows that early texts explain the use of common nouns by appeal to similarity relations, not mereological relations. However, it further argues that some early texts do characterize the relation between individuals and collections as a mereological relation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/pew.2007.0045
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,810
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The “White Horse is Not Horse” Debate.Lisa Indraccolo - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (10):e12434.
Classical Chinese Logic.Jana S. Rošker - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (5):301-309.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
541 ( #3,245 of 2,202,780 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #97,465 of 2,202,780 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature