Not Disllusioned: Reply to Commentators

Journal of Consciousness Studies 23 (11-12):256-289 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This piece replies to commentators on my target article in this issue, 'Illusionism as a Theory of Consciousness', building on the arguments offered there. It groups commentators together by their attitude to illusionism, classifying them as advocates, explorers, sceptics, and opponents. It expands on the case for illusionism, refines the position, and responds to objections.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is at Stake in Illusionism?J. Tartaglia - 2016 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 23 (11-12):236-255.
Illusionism as a Theory of Consciousness.Keith Frankish - 2016 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 23 (11-12):11-39.
Meta-Illusionism and Qualia Quietism.Pete Mandik - 2016 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 23 (11-12):140-148.
Against Illusionism.J. Prinz - 2016 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 23 (11-12):186-196.
Sceptical Alternatives: Strong Illusionism versus Modest Realism.R. C. Schriner - 2018 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 25 (9-10):209-227.
Debunking Arguments for Illusionism about Consciousness.David Chalmers - 2020 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 27 (5-6):258-281.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-22

Downloads
67 (#257,482)

6 months
6 (#1,127,190)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keith Frankish
University of Sheffield

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references