Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1):129-136 (1999)

Authors
Nancy Frankenberry
Dartmouth College
Abstract
The philosophical question Nunez raises is whether we can have, as he thinks we need, a theoretical grounding for appeal to the intrinsic value of nature. This article examines the neopragmatist reasons for repudiating metaphysical realism's notions of intrinsicality and subject-independent reality. Following the holism of Donald Davidson and Richard Rorty rather than the epistemological premises of Holmes Rolston and Bernard Lonergan, the author concludes that coping with the ecological crisis does not require conjuring an epistemic crisis. Environmental ethics in neopragmatist hands would seek procedures for bringing about agreement in improving our practices, not our epistemology
Keywords holism  epistemic justification  environmental ethics  neopragmatism  intrinsic value
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/0384-9694.00008
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,856
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
7 ( #998,305 of 2,401,764 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #361,744 of 2,401,764 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes