Philorum A philosophy forum Jim Franklin - Is there anything wrong with pornography? (Debate with Patricia Petersen) 02 Jun 2004

Abstract

Argues that married sex is an extreme sexual practice that shows up pornography and other alternatives as second best.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Virtue Ethics Old and New. [REVIEW]Pamela M. Hall - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):332-332.
The ethics of sexual objectification: Autonomy and consent.Patricia Marino - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (4):345 – 364.
Cartesian Views: Papers Presented to Richard A. Watson[REVIEW]Patricia A. Easton - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):320-321.
Pornography and power.Amy Allen - 2001 - Journal of Social Philosophy 32 (4):512–531.
Linguistic authority and convention in a speech act analysis of pornography.Nellie Wieland - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):435 – 456.
Loose women, lecherous men: A feminist philosophy of sex.Linda Lemoncheck - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 89 (2-3):369-373.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
100 (#169,877)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Franklin
University of New South Wales

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references