Quakers Hill Press (1996)
Why do students take the instruction "prove" in examinations to mean "go to the next question"? Because they have not been shown the simple techniques of how to do it. Mathematicians meanwhile generate a mystique of proof, as if it requires an inborn and unteachable genius. True, creating research-level proofs does require talent; but reading and understanding the proof that the square of an even number is even is within the capacity of most mortals.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$13.71 used (9% off) $14.09 new (7% off) $14.44 direct from Amazon (4% off) Amazon page|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Non-Deductive Logic in Mathematics.James Franklin - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):1-18.
.[author unknown] - unknown
Numbers and Proofs.R. B. J. T. Allenby - 1997 - Copublished in North, South, and Central America by John Wiley & Sons.
Proof in Mathematics ("If", "Then" and "Perhaps"): A Collection of Material Illustrating the Nature and Variety of the Idea of Proof in Mathematics.P. R. Baxandall (ed.) - 1978 - University of Keele, Institute of Education.
Evolution of Mathematical Proof.Marian Mrozek & Jacek Urbaniec - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (1):77-85.
Philosophy of Mathematics: A Contemporary Introduction to the World of Proofs and Pictures.James Robert Brown - 2008 - Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads91 ( #57,591 of 2,177,978 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,489 of 2,177,978 )
How can I increase my downloads?