Stove's discovery of the worst argument in the world

Philosophy 77 (4):615-624 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The winning entry in David Stove's Competition to Find the Worst Argument in the World was: “We can know things only as they are related to us/insofar as they fall under our conceptual schemes, etc., so, we cannot know things as they are in themselves.” That argument underpins many recent relativisms, including postmodernism, post-Kuhnian sociological philosophy of science, cultural relativism, sociobiological versions of ethical relativism, and so on. All such arguments have the same form as ‘We have eyes, therefore we cannot see’, and are equally invalid.

Similar books and articles

Stove on the rationality of induction and the uniformity thesis.Michael Rowan - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (3):561-566.
Scepticism, relativism and the argument from the criterion.Howard Sankey - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):182-190.
The overdetermination argument revisited.Agustín Vicente - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (3):331-47.
Scientific Irrationalism: Origins of a Postmodern Cult.David Charles Stove - 1998 - New Brunswick, NJ, USA: Transaction Publishers.
Transcendental idealism in the 'aesthetic'.Kieran Setiya - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):63–88.
An Argument By Stove Against Inductive Scepticism.Andrew Pickin - 2006 - Dissertation, University of Cambridge


Added to PP

344 (#34,188)

6 months
97 (#9,076)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Models and reality.Hilary Putnam - 1980 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 45 (3):464-482.
Healthy Scepticism.James Franklin - 1991 - Philosophy 66 (257):305 - 324.
The social theory of truth.P. H. Partridge - 1936 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 14 (3):161 – 175.
The social theory of truth.P. H. Partridge - 1936 - Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy 14 (3):161-175.

Add more references