Religious Studies 17 (2):179 - 197 (1981)

Authors
Nancy Frankenberry
Dartmouth College
Abstract
What good is divinity if it can come only in dreams and shadows…? It is a well-known and rarely challenged assumption that one of the chief merits of Whitehead's cosmology is that it enables religious thinkers to come at the problem of God in relation to the presence of evil in an entirely new way. Among the virtues most commonly appealed to in praise of the Whiteheadian theodicy are its emphasis on God's persuasive, rather than controlling power; its defence of the moral goodness of the God whose nature is reconceived in the light of the problem of evil; and its provision for a realistic hope in the redemptive processes operative in divine and human history. However, none of these aspects of process theodicy is without serious problems. In what follows I will present certain reasons why I do not believe process theism has made good its claim to have solved, with the help of Whitehead's philosophy, the problem of evil. Rather, I will suggest that like the story of what happened to the donkey laden with salt, who took to the water, process theology's ‘solution’ to the problem of evil dissolves in the dialectic river of life, until nothing is left but the verbal sack in which it is contained. Much of the force of this critique will hinge on recognizing the systematic implications of the role of ambiguity in a processive-relational universe, a position I will summarize in conclusion
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412500000962
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,899
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Process Theodicy and the Concept of Power.Nelson Pike - 1982 - Process Studies 12 (3):148-167.
Non-Human Animals and Process Theodicy.Gary Chartier - 2006 - Religious Studies 42 (1):3-26.
John Hick’s Soul-Making Theodicy and the Virtue of Love.Eric Silverman - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Research 34:329-343.
Swinburne on Providence.Richard M. Gale - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (2):209-219.
Is the Problem of Evil a Problem for Descartes?Brett Gaul - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:209-220.
A Philosophy of Evil.Lars Fr H. Svendsen - 2010 - Dalkey Archive Press.
Theodicy, Abridged.Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz - 1966 - Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
13 ( #711,329 of 2,402,070 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,323 of 2,402,070 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes