Science Under Siege: Defending Science, Exposing Pseudoscience

Prometheus (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For more than thirty years, The Skeptical Inquirer has steadfastly championed science and reason. In this new collection of outstanding recent articles, editor Kendrick Frazier has selected some of the best writing on topics of current interest.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Sociobiology a Pseudoscience?R. Paul Thompson - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 370.
Cutting the Gordian Knot of Demarcation.Sven Ove Hansson - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):237-243.
Science under siege?: interest groups and the science wars.Leon E. Trachtman - 2000 - Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Edited by Robert Perrucci.
Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience.Paul R. Thagard - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:223 - 234.
The siege of science.Michael Taylor, Pandelis Perakakis & Varvara Trachana - 2008 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (1):17-40.
Why scientists should cooperate with journalists.Boyce Rensberger - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):549-552.
Review. A house built on sand: Exposing postmodernist myths about science. N Koertge [ed].G. Gutting - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (1):191-195.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-22

Downloads
5 (#1,469,565)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Knowledge: Genuine and Bogus.Mario Bunge - 2011 - Science & Education 20 (5-6):411-438.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references