Phronesis 46 (4):413-439 (2001)
In this paper I offer a new interpretation of the philosophical method of the "Meno." In the opening discussion of the dialogue, Plato introduces a restriction on answers in dialectical inquiry, which I call the Dialectical Requirement (DR). The DR is applied twice in the "Meno," in different ways (75d5-7, 79d1-3). In the first section of the paper, I argue that the two applications of the DR represent the beginning and end of dialectic. This shows that dialectical inquiry starts from our linguistic competence with the name of the property we investigate, and ends only when we have an account saying what is common to and explanatory of the bearers of that property. Dialectic begins in our ordinary ability to speak and think about the world, and ends in genuine grasp of the underlying causes of nature. In the second section, I describe the resources of linguistic competence, and their role in dialectical progress. Our linguistic competence with the name of a property enables us to make a wide variety of statements about the property and its bearers in ordinary discourse. In dialectic, these ordinary statements act as a portfolio in which the property under investigation is presented to us writ large, through its instances, types, species, etc. We seek to develop an account that says what is common to, and explanatory of the phenomena in the portfolio. When an account is inconsistent with one of the things we tend to say, this demands revision either in the account, or in the portfolio of statements. In this way, the process by which we develop our account also helps to organize and revise the statements in our portfolio so that they and the account ultimately form a coherent, explanatory body of statements
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Meno's Paradox, the Slave-Boy Interrogation, and the Unity of Platonic Recollection.Lee Franklin - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (4):349-377.
Plotinus on Dialectic.Annamaria Schiaparelli - 2009 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (3):253-287.
Kierkegaard's Non-Dialectical Dialectic or That Kierkegaard is Not Hegelian.Henry B. Piper - 2004 - International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (4):497-517.
On the Alleged Extensionality of "Causal Explanatory Contexts".Cindy Stern - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (4):614-625.
Understanding Dialectical Thinking From a Cultural-Historical Perspective.Wan-chi Wong - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (2):239 – 260.
The Development of Dialectic From Plato to Aristotle.Jakob L. Fink (ed.) - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
Niedookreślenie językowe z punktu widzenia teorii zwrotnych warunków prawdziwości.Maciej Witek - 2009 - Filozofia Nauki 17 (3).
Diagonal Method and Dialectical Logic: Tools, Materials, and Groundworks for a Logical Foundation of Dialectic and Speculative Philosophy.Uwe Petersen - 2002 - Der Andere Verlag.
The Meno's Metaphilosophical Examples.Matthew King - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):395-412.
Dialectic as Praxis.Joel Kovel - 2008 - In Bertell Ollman & Tony Smith (eds.), Science and Society. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 474 - 482.
Freedom, Dialectic and Philosophical Anthropology.Craig Reeves - 2013 - Journal of Critical Realism 12 (1):13-44.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads28 ( #183,838 of 2,172,023 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #173,295 of 2,172,023 )
How can I increase my downloads?