William J. Morgan’s ‘conventionalist internalism’ approach. Furthering internalism? A critical hermeneutical response
Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 8 (2):157-171 (2014)
AbstractSeveral authors, such as William J. Morgan, John S. Russell and R. Scott Kretchmar, have claimed that the limits between the diverse normative theories of sport need to be revisited. Most of these works are philosophically grounded in Anglo-American philosophical approaches. For instance, William J. Morgan’s proposal is mainly based on Richard Rorty’s philosophy. But he also discusses with some European philosophers like Jürgen Habermas. However, Habermas’ central ideas are rejected by Morgan. The purpose of this paper is to analyse Morgan’s rejection of Habermas’ thought and show that a more appropriate normative of sport that explains better our current sporting world can be achieved by drawing on the German philosopher’s ideas. The plan of this paper is the following. It shall analyse the limits of the distinction between broad internalism and externalism by taking Morgan’s work as its starting point. To do so, firstly, the conventionalist way in which Morgan criticises the limits of interpretivism sha..
Similar books and articles
Moral Antirealism, Internalism, and Sport.William J. Morgan - 2004 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 31 (2):161-183.
Head or Tail? De Morgan on the Bounds of Traditional Logic.Víctor Sánchez Valencia - 1997 - History and Philosophy of Logic 18 (3):123-138.
Morgan on Deductive Explanation: A Rejoinder. [REVIEW]Raimo Tuomela - 1976 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (4):527 - 543.
Broad Internalism, Deep Conventions, Moral Entrepreneurs, and Sport.William J. Morgan - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39 (1):65-100.
Lasch on Sport and the Culture of Narcissism: A Critical Reappraisal.William J. Morgan - 1991 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 18 (1):1-23.
Regeneration: Thomas Hunt Morgan’s Window Into Development. [REVIEW]Mary Evelyn Sunderland - 2010 - Journal of the History of Biology 43 (2):325 - 361.
Are Sports More So Private or Public Practices?: A Critical Look at Some Recent Rortian Interpretations of Sport.William J. Morgan - 2000 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 27 (1):17-34.
Listening to Steroids.John Hoberman & William J. Morgan - 2007 - In William J. Morgan (ed.), Ethics in Sport. Human Kinetics. pp. 235--244.
Must We Play to Win? A Reply to Morgan.Maksymilian Del Mar - 2015 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (2):266-272.
Ethnocentrism and the Social Criticism of Sports: A Response to Roberts.William J. Morgan - 1998 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 25 (1):81-102.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Beyond Habermas, with Habermas: Adjudicating Ethical Issues in Sport Through a Discourse Ethics-Based Normative Theory of Sport.Francisco Javier Lopez Frias - 2021 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 15 (1):43-58.
Pragmatic Conventionalism and Sport Normativity in the Face of Intractable Dilemmas.Tim L. Elcombe & Alun R. Hardman - 2019 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 47 (1):14-32.
The Hermeneutics of Sport: Limits and Conditions of Possibility of Our Understandings of Sport.Francisco Javier Lopez Frias & Xavier Gimeno Monfort - 2016 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 10 (4):375-391.
Sport, Habermas, and the Moral Sphere: A Response to Lopez Frias.William J. Morgan - 2015 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 9 (3):287-302.
References found in this work
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Jürgen Habermas (ed.) - 1996 - Polity.
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Frank I. Michelman & Jurgen Habermas - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (6):307.
Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics.Jürgen Habermas - 1993 - MIT Press.
Internalism and Internal Values in Sport.Robert L. Simon - 2000 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 27 (1):1-16.