An Argument Against General Validity?

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):4-9 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that a prominent—and oft-thought to be persuasive—argument against general validity as the best account of validity for languages containing the actuality operator is flawed, the flaw arising out of inadequate attention to the formalisation of mood distinctions

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1002/tht3.1

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,456

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Modal validity and the dispensability of the actuality operator.Vittorio Morato - 2014 - In Michal Dancak & Vit Puncochar (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2013.
The formal validity and real significance of the ontological argument.Charles Hartshorne - 1944 - Philosophical Review 53 (3):225-245.
Actuality, Necessity, and Logical Truth.William H. Hanson - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 130 (3):437-459.
The Validity of the Argument from Inductive Risk.Matthew J. Brown & Jacob Stegenga - 2023 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 53 (2):187-190.
Logical truth in modal languages: reply to Nelson and Zalta. [REVIEW]William H. Hanson - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):327-339.
Credulity and Experience of God.Jerome Gellman - 2007 - Philo 10 (2):114-124.
In the mood.Kai Frederick Wehmeier - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (6):607-630.
Teaching Validity with a Stanley Thermos.Andrew Chrucky - 1998 - Philosophy Now 22:22-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-30

Downloads
77 (#227,301)

6 months
11 (#529,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rohan French
University of California, Davis

Citations of this work

Actual Issues for Relevant Logics.Shawn Standefer - 2020 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 7.
The Logic of Sequence Frames.Fabio Lampert - 2022 - Review of Symbolic Logic 15 (1):101-132.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity: Lectures Given to the Princeton University Philosophy Colloquium.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Edited by Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel.
Naming and necessity.Saul Kripke - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing about language. New York: Routledge. pp. 431-433.
Two notions of necessity.Martin Davies & Lloyd Humberstone - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 38 (1):1-31.
Two-dimensional adventures.Lloyd Humberstone - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 118 (1-2):17--65.
Logical and analytic truths that are not necessary.Edward N. Zalta - 1988 - Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):57-74.

View all 10 references / Add more references