History and Philosophy of Logic 16 (1):1-18 (1995)
One semantic and two syntactic decision procedures are given for determining the validity of Aristotelian assertoric and apodeictic syllogisms. Results are obtained by using the Aristotelian deductions that necessarily have an even number of premises.
|Keywords||Aristotle syllogisms apodeictic assertoric decision procedures deductions|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A New Approach to Aristotle's Apodeictic Syllogisms.Nicholas Rescher & Zane Parks - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 24 (4):678 - 689.
Adaptive Versus Veridical Decision Making and the Frontal Lobes.E. Goldberg & K. Podell - 1999 - Consciousness and Cognition 8 (3):364-377.
S4 and Aristotle on Three Syllogisms with Contingent Premisses.Charles J. Kelly - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:405-431.
Intuition and the Junctures of Judgment in Decision Procedures for Clinical Ethics.John K. Davis - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (1):1-30.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads93 ( #56,224 of 2,178,255 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,208 of 2,178,255 )
How can I increase my downloads?