Can act-utilitarianism be put into practice?

Journal of Value Inquiry 11 (1):49-58 (1977)

A frequent objection to act-Utilitarianism is that, Because the consequences of acts extend indefinitely into the future, I cannot put the theory into practice, By trying to decide on its basis what it would be right to do in this case. I reinforce this unworkability argument with an argument designed to show that our ignorance of acts' total actual consequences, At least in the case of a great many acts, Stems not merely from remoteness in the causal and/or temporal orders but also from the "kinds" of consequences which go to comprise acts' total actual consequences
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00933987
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,229
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On the Threshold Argument Against Consumer Meat Purchases.Gary Chartier - 2005 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (2):233–249.
On the Threshold Argument Against Consumer Meat Purchases.Gary Chartier - 2006 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (2):233-249.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
56 ( #159,344 of 2,289,939 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #837,039 of 2,289,939 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature