Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (4):345-367 (2005)
Recent policy developments in the area of livestock husbandry have suggested that, from the perspective of optimizing animal welfare, new animal husbandry systems should be developed that provide opportunities for livestock animals to be raised in environments where they are permitted to engage in “natural behavior.” It is not known whether consumers regard animal husbandry issues as important, and whether they differentiate between animal husbandry and other animal welfare issues. The responsibility for the development of such systems is allocated jointly between farmers, regulators, different actors in the food chain, and consumers. This research focuses on understanding consumer attitudes and preferences regarding the development and introduction of such systems, to ensure that they are acceptable to consumers as well as producers, regulators, and scientists. Consumer perceptions of animal welfare and animal husbandry practices were evaluated using quantitative consumer survey, which focused on two animal husbandry issues – farmed pigs and farmed fish. Following pilot work, 1000 representative Dutch consumers were sampled about their attitudes to either pig or fish husbandry. The results indicated that consumers think about animal welfare in terms of two broad categories related to their health and living environment, but do not think about welfare issues at a more detailed level. Greater concern was expressed about the welfare of pigs compared to fish. Consumer trust in labeling also emerged as an important issue, since consumers need to trust different food chain actors with responsibility for promoting animal welfare, and are reluctant to consider the details of animal husbandry systems. As a consequence, a transparent, enforceable, and traceable monitoring system for animal welfare friendly products is likely to be important for consumers.
|Keywords||Animal welfare fish farming pig farming consumer attitudes|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Societal Concerns About PORK and PORK Production and Their Relationships to the Production System.Egbert Kanis, Ab F. Groen & Karel H. De Greef - 2003 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (2):137-162.
Impact of Animal Welfare on Costs and Viability of Pig Production in the UK.H. L. I. Bornett, J. H. Guy & P. J. Cain - 2003 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (2):163-186.
Citations of this work BETA
Who Cares About Farmed Fish? Citizen Perceptions of the Welfare and the Mental Abilities of Fish.Saara Kupsala, Pekka Jokinen & Markus Vinnari - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):119-135.
Exploring the Potential of Dutch Pig Farmers and Urban-Citizens to Learn Through Frame Reflection.Benard Marianne & de Cock Buning Tjard - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (5):1015-1036.
Sustainability at the Crossroads of Fish Consumption and Production Ethical Dilemmas of Fish Buyers at Retail Organizations in The Netherlands.Karianne Kalshoven & Franck L. B. Meijboom - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):101-117.
Consumer Attitudes to Different Pig Production Systems: A Study From Mainland China. [REVIEW]Marcia Dutra de Barcellos, Klaus G. Grunert, Yanfeng Zhou, Wim Verbeke, F. J. A. Perez-Cueto & Athanasios Krystallis - 2013 - Agriculture and Human Values 30 (3):443-455.
Fish Consumption: Choices in the Intersection of Public Concern, Fish Welfare, Food Security, Human Health and Climate Change.Helena Röcklinsberg - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (3):533-551.
Similar books and articles
Concepts of Animal Welfare in Relation to Positions in Animal Ethics.Kirsten Schmidt - 2011 - Acta Biotheoretica 59 (2):153-171.
Animal Welfare, Trust, Governance, and the Public Good.Raymond Anthony - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:275-280.
The Price of Responsibility: Ethics of Animal Husbandry in a Time of Climate Change. [REVIEW]M. Gjerris, C. Gamborg, H. Röcklinsberg & R. Anthony - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (4):331-350.
Animal Welfare: Limping Towards Eden: A Practical Approach to Redressing the Problem of Our Dominion Over the Animals.John Webster - 2005 - Blackwell.
Animal Agriculture: Symbiosis, Culture, or Ethical Conflict? [REVIEW]Vonne Lund & I. Anna S. Olsson - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1):47-56.
Qualitative Stakeholder Analysis for the Development of Sustainable Monitoring Systems for Farm Animal Welfare.M. B. M. Bracke, K. H. De Greef & H. Hopster - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (1):27-56.
Swiss Market for Meat From Animal-Friendly Production – Responses of Public and Private Actors in Switzerland.Sibyl Anwander Phan-Huy & Ruth Badertscher Fawaz - 2003 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (2):119-136.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #202,526 of 2,146,275 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #386,504 of 2,146,275 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.