Commentary: Please Acknowledge that Biology Is Not an Exact Science

Biological Theory 1 (4):335-337 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1162/biot.2006.1.4.335

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Can biology be an exact science?J. J. C. Smart - 1959 - Synthese 11 (4):359 - 368.
The limits of exact science, from economics to physics.Nancy Cartwright - 1999 - Perspectives on Science 7 (3):318-336.
Sources of Domain-Independence in the Formal Sciences.Kevin de Laplante - unknown
Noesis: Plato on exact science.W. W. Tait - 2002 - In David B. Malament (ed.), Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics. Open Court. pp. 11--31.
Systems biology, synthetic biology and data-driven research: A commentary on Krohs, Callebaut, and O'Malley and Soyer.Jane Calvert - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1):81-84.
Exact tests, confidence regions and estimates.P. Martin-Löf - 1977 - Synthese 36 (2):195 - 206.
The Constructive Realist Account of Science and Its Application to Ilya Prigogine’s Conception of Laws of Nature.Ave Mets & Piret Kuusk - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (3):239-248.
The Biological Principle of Natural Sciences and the Logos of Life of Natural Philosophy: A Comparison and the Perspectives of Unifying the Science and Philosophy of Life.Attila Grandpierre - 2011 - Analecta Husserliana 110:711-727.
Exact equality and successor function: Two key concepts on the path towards understanding exact numbers.Véronique Izard, Pierre Pica, Elizabeth S. Spelke & Stanislas Dehaene - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (4):491 – 505.
Is biology a provincial science?Ronald Munson - 1975 - Philosophy of Science 42 (4):428-447.
The Relation of Ethics and Science: A Commentary on "The Study of Socioethical Issues in Systems Biology".Daniel Drell - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (4):79-80.
The problem of processes and transitions: are diseases phase kinds? [REVIEW]Stefan Dragulinescu - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):79-89.
Philosophy of Biology.Ingo Brigandt - 2011 - In Steven French & Juha Saatsi (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to the Philosophy of Science. London: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 246-267.
Debates in Philosophy of Biology: One Long Argument, or Many?Catherine Kendig - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):73 - 81.
The "genetic program" program: A commentary on Maynard Smith on information in biology.Kim Sterelny - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (2):195-201.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Genesis and development of a scientific fact.Ludwik Fleck - 1979 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by T. J. Trenn & R. K. Merton.
The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences.Eugene Wigner - 1960 - Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 13:1-14.
Les Atomes.Jean Perrin - 1913 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 21 (4):4-6.

Add more references