Chronic vegetative states: Intrinsic value of biological process

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (4):395-408 (1984)
Abstract
has been put forth by Rolston, which leads to respect for the irreversibly comatose by virtue of the residual biological (objective) life. By comparing objective and subjective life, he develops a naturalistic principle which he contrasts with the humanistic norm of contemporary medical ethics. He claims there are clinical applications which would necessarily follow. A critique of this viewpoint is presented here, which begins with an analysis of what might be of value in spontaneous objective life. A measure of the moral worth of simple objective life is attempted by means of comparison with our attitudes toward animals. Finally, some of the clinical applications suggested by Rolston are reviewed. Except for euthanasia, there appear to be few clinical situations where the naturalistic principle helps in problem solving. Keywords: naturalistic principle, value of life, irreversibly comatose CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/9.4.395
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Unity of the Natural Sciences: Comment on Portmann.Thure Von Uexkuell - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (5):473-480.
A Life Not Worth Living?Craig Paterson - 2003 - Studies in Christian Ethics 16 (2):1-20.
A Theory of Health and Disease: The Objectivist-Subjectivist Dichotomy.Robert M. Sade - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (5):513-525.
Are Values in Nature Subjective or Objective? Rolston - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (2):125-151.
Are Values in Nature Subjective or Objective?Iii Holmes Rolston - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (2):125-151.
The Inherent Paternalism in Clinical Practice.Henrik R. Wulff - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (3):299-311.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-16

Total downloads

8 ( #495,901 of 2,177,979 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #317,206 of 2,177,979 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums