Hegel Bulletin 32 (1-2):163-186 (2011)

Authors
Fabian Freyenhagen
University of Essex
Abstract
Like two heavyweight boxers exchanging punches, but neither landing the knock-out blow, Kantians and Hegelians seem to be in a stand-off on what in contemporary parlance is known as the Empty Formalism Objection. Kant's ethics is charged with being merely formal and thereby failing to provide the kind of specific guidance that any defensible ethical system should have the resources to provide. Hegel is often credited with having formulated this objection in its most incisive way, and a wealth of Kantian responses has been deployed to answer it. In this paper, I take up the objection as it appears in §135R ofElements of the Philosophy of Rightin order to scrutinise the contemporary debate between the two camps. I propose that there are, in fact, three different, albeit connected objections and examine the best Kantian replies to them. I will not adjudicate which of these replies is the most accurate interpretation of Kant's texts, nor trace the particular historical context in which Hegel takes up Kant's ethics, nor the way the Empty Formalism Objection fits into Hegel's wider system. This is partly because of constraints of space, and partly because many of the contemporary Kantian replies — for better or for worse — treat the Empty Formalism Objection as a self-standing philosophical problem, irrespective of its historical context or systematic place in Hegel's theory. My limited aim here is to show that, even if one grants — for argument's sake — the legitimacy of such a non-contextual approach, significant difficulties remain.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0263523200000215
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,707
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Phenomenology of Spirit.G. W. F. Hegel & A. V. Miller - 1977 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (4):268-271.
The Practice of Moral Judgment.Paul Guyer - 1993 - Ethics 106 (2):404-423.
Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy.John Rawls & Barbara Herman - 2002 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):178-179.
The Practice of Moral Judgment.Thomas E. Hill - 1995 - Journal of Philosophy 92 (1):47.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Logical Form and Ethical Content.Songsuk Susan Hahn - 2011 - Hegel Bulletin 32 (1-2):143-162.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

From Emptiness to Hunger.G. J. Bednar - 2016 - Renascence 68 (3):194-209.
Realizing the Good: Hegel's Critique of Kantian Morality.Nicolás García Mills - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy (1):195-212.
First Order Logic with Empty Structures.Mohamed A. Amer - 1989 - Studia Logica 48 (2):169 - 177.
The Structure of Emptiness.Graham Priest - 2009 - Philosophy East and West 59 (4):pp. 467-480.
Empty Names and Pragmatic Millianism.Seyed N. Mousavian - 2014 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):49-58.
Universality, Singularity, Difference.How Empty Can Empty Be - 2004 - In Simon Critchley & Oliver Marchart (eds.), Laclau: A Critical Reader. Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-08-04

Total views
15 ( #616,577 of 2,333,199 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #396,114 of 2,333,199 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes