Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):60-77 (2013)

Authors
Abstract
The chance objection to incompatibilist accounts of free action maintains that undetermined actions are not under the agent's control. Some attempts to circumvent this objection locate chance in events posterior to the action. Indeterministic-causation theories locate chance in events prior to the action. However, neither type of response gives an account of free action which avoids the chance objection. Chance must be located at the act of will if actions are to be both undetermined and under the agent's control. This dissolves the apparent paradox of Frankfurt-type cases as well as the chance objection to incompatibilist free will.
Keywords chance  Frankfurt-type cases  free action  free will  indeterministic causation  probability  willings  immediarte control  ceteris-paribus law  incompatibilism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/00455091.2013.803826
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,205
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Actions, Reasons, and Causes.Donald Davidson - 1963 - Journal of Philosophy 60 (23):685.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.
Motivation and Agency.Alfred R. Mele - 2003 - Oxford University Press.

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-02-25

Total views
175 ( #59,288 of 2,444,491 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #103,190 of 2,444,491 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes