Philosophical Studies 55 (1):1-22 (1989)
Some recent work in the philosophy of quantum mechanics has suggested that quantum systems can be thought of as non-separable and therefore non-individual, in some sense, in Bell and E.P.R. type situations. This suggestion is set in the context of previous work regarding the individuality of quantal particles and it is argued that such entities can be considered as individuals if their non-classical statistical correlations are understood in terms of non-supervenient relations holding between them. We conclude that such relations are strongly non-supervenient in Cleland's sense and note a possible connection between this idea and the realist quantum logic programme
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
On the Physical Significance of the Locality Conditions in the Bell Arguments.Jon P. Jarrett - 1984 - Noûs 18 (4):569-589.
Quantum Physics and the Identity of Indiscernibles.Steven French & Michael Redhead - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (2):233-246.
Relational Holism and Quantum Mechanics.Teller Paul - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (1):71-81.
Citations of this work BETA
Quantum Entanglement and a Metaphysics of Relations.Michael Esfeld - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (4):601-617.
Relational Holism and Humean Supervenience.G. Darby - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (4):773-788.
Humean Supervenience in the Light of Contemporary Science.Vassilios Karakostas - 2009 - Metaphysica 10 (1):1-26.
Quantum Entanglement and a Metaphysics of Relations.Michael Esfeld - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (4):601-617.
Schrödinger's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Relevance of Bohr's Experimental Critique.Slobodan Perovic - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (2):275-297.
Similar books and articles
A Discussion on Particle Number and Quantum Indistinguishability.Graciela Domenech & Federico Holik - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (6):855-878.
A Formal Framework for Quantum Non-Individuality.Décio Krause & Steven French - 1995 - Synthese 102 (1):195 - 214.
Non‐Seperability, Non‐Supervenience, and Quantum Ontology.Darrin W. Belousek - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (4):791-811.
Quantum Chaos and Semiclassical Mechanics.Robert Batterman - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:50-65.
Bell's Theorem, Nonseparability, and Spacetime Individuation in Quantum Mechanics.Darrin W. Belousek - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):46.
A Loophole in Bell's Theorem? Parameter Dependence in the Hess‐Philipp Model.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1357-1367.
Non-Local Realistic Theories and the Scope of the Bell Theorem.Federico Laudisa - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 38 (12):1110-1132.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads50 ( #104,342 of 2,168,591 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,836 of 2,168,591 )
How can I increase my downloads?