Neuroscience and Penal Law: Ineffectiveness of the Penal Systems and Flawed Perception of the Under-Evaluation of Behaviour Constituting Crime. The Particular Case of Crime Regarding Intangible Goods.Michael Freeman & Laura Capraro
Similar books and articles
On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility.Nicole A. Vincent - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
Reciprocity and Neuroscience in Public Health Law.A. M. Viens - 2011 - In Michael Freeman (ed.), Law and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
The Impact of Neuroscience and Genetics on the Law: A Recent Italian Case.M. Farisco & C. Petrini - 2012 - Neuroethics 5 (3):317-319.
Law and Bioethics: Current Legal Issues Volume 11.Michael Freeman (ed.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Responsible Choices, Desert-Based Legal Institutions, and the Challenges of Contemporary Neuroscience.Michael S. Moore - 2012 - Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):233-279.
Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement.Andrew Brook & Kathleen Akins (eds.) - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads