European Journal of Philosophy 28 (4):1029-1043 (2020)

Authors
Rachel Fredericks
Ball State University
Abstract
In Fredericks (2018b), I argued that we can be morally responsible for our concepts if they are mental representations. Here, I make a complementary argument for the claim that even if concepts are abstract objects, we can be morally responsible for coming to grasp and for thinking (or not thinking) in terms of them. As before, I take for granted Angela Smith's (2005) rational relations account of moral responsibility, though I think the same conclusion follows from various other accounts. My strategy is to focus on the relations that can obtain between concepts (understood as abstract objects) and morally responsible agents. I conclude by discussing some of the reasons why my arguments matter, which have to do with consequential choices between conceptual options, purposefully seeking out concepts that are new to us, and moral education.
Keywords abstract objects  Angela Smith  concepts  moral responsibility
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/ejop.12547
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Social Life of Slurs.Geoffrey Nunberg - 2018 - In Daniel Fogal, Daniel Harris & Matt Moss (eds.), New Work on Speech Acts. Oxford University Press.
[Book Review] the Racial Contract. [REVIEW]Charles W. Mills - 1999 - Social Theory and Practice 25 (1):155-160.
Conceptual Ethics I.Alexis Burgess & David Plunkett - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (12):1091-1101.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Responsibility for Concepts.Rachel Fredericks - 2018 - European Journal of Philosophy 26 (4):1381-1397.
The Theory-Theory of Moral Concepts.John Jung Park - 2015 - Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics 3 (2).
Metacognition and Abstract Concepts.Nicholas Shea - 2018 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 373.
Creating Legal Terms: A Linguistic Perspective. [REVIEW]Pius ten Hacken - 2010 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 23 (4):407-425.
Perceiving Abstract Concepts.Katja Wiemer-Hastings & Arthur C. Graesser - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):635-636.
Conceptual Responsibility.Trystan S. Goetze - 2021 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64 (1-2):20-45.
A Study of Concepts.Paul Weirich - 1994 - Review of Metaphysics 48 (1):159-160.
Thick Concepts and Holism About Reasons.Andrew Sneddon - 2010 - Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (4):461-468.
A New Approach to the Grounding of Abstract Concepts.Tim Seuchter - 2011 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):63.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-06-19

Total views
49 ( #217,827 of 2,449,119 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,039 of 2,449,119 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes