Abstract
This interpretation of the conditions of the reception of the Decalogue in medieval Christianity and the Reformation period supports the hypothesis that the leading perspectives of ethics are formed by basic assumptions of the reality of human life. This hypothesis is contrary to G.E. Moore’s socalled ›naturalistic fallacy‹, because the ›natural law‹ as an important basic assumption implies a view of nature different from modern times. It is either founded in the eternal divine law or in a flexible conception close to history and change. The Melanchthonian conception, however, relies more or less on a nonhistoric view which implies the notion of human dignity combined with the construction of practical principles appealing to all human persons. In contrast to the Anglosaxon mainstream of ethical thought we find here first indicators of an ethics which combines a transcendental foundation and an examination of everyday’s norms. Thus the Decalogue inspires the search for the conceptions of reality in the background of norms.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.14315/zee-2010-0104
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,289
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Naturrecht 1802-1805/06.Hegels Naturrecht - 1976 - Hegel-Studien 11:219-227.
Naturrecht und christliche Ethik.Peter Bubmann - 1993 - Zeitschrift Für Evangelische Ethik 37 (1):267-280.
Unter welchen Bedingungen ist evangelische Ethik möglich?G. Hillerdal - 1957 - Zeitschrift Für Evangelische Ethik 1 (1):241-254.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-01-11

Total views
5 ( #1,167,673 of 2,445,269 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,173 of 2,445,269 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes