Polish Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):39-57 (2011)
Strawson offers three accounts of singular predication: a grammatical, a category and a mediating account. I argue that the grammatical and mediating accounts are refuted by a host of counter-examples and that the latter is worse than useless. In later works Strawson defends only the category account. This account entails that singular terms cannot be predicates; it excludes non-denoting singular terms from being logical subjects, except by means of an ad hoc analogy; it depends upon a notion of identification that is too vague; and it is unnecessarily complicated, relying on analogies where a more uniform explanation should be possible. But I show how the account can be corrected to avoid all these difficulties and to provide an accurate account of singular predication.
|Keywords||Connotation denotation predicate predication singular term Strawson subject Mill properties|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Singular Terms, Predicates and the Spurious 'Is' of Identity.Danny Frederick - 2013 - Dialectica 67 (3):325-343.
Similar books and articles
On Strawson' Substitute for Scope.E. Patton Thomas - 1978 - Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (2):291 - 304.
Replies and Discussion on Strawson' Substitute for Scope.Thomas E. Patton - 1978 - Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (2):291-304.
Concepts and Properties or Predication and Copulation.P. F. Strawson - 1987 - Philosophical Quarterly 37 (149):402-406.
Added to index2010-04-28
Total downloads816 ( #1,103 of 2,169,095 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,850 of 2,169,095 )
How can I increase my downloads?