Libertarian Papers 2 (5):1-21 (2010)
The dominant tradition in Western philosophy sees rationality as dictating. Thus rationality may require that we believe the best explanation and simple conceptual truths and that we infer in accordance with evident rules of inference. I argue that, given what we know about the growth of knowledge, this authoritarian concept of rationality leads to absurdities and should be abandoned. I then outline a libertarian concept of rationality, derived from Popper, which eschews the dictates and which sees a rational agent as one who questions, criticises, conjectures and experiments. I argue that, while the libertarian approach escapes the absurdities of the authoritarian, it requires two significant developments and an important clarification to be made fully consistent with itself.
|Keywords||Rationality Authoritarian Libertarian Popper Knowledge Inference Rationalism Critical rationalism Irrational Rational Requirements|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Asymmetry, Scope, and Rational Consistency.Julian Fink - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):109-130.
On Critical and Pancritical Rationalism.A. Diller - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):127-156.
Rationality in Question: On Eastern and Western Views of Rationality.Shlomo Biderman & Ben-Ami Scharfstein (eds.) - 1989 - E.J. Brill.
Popper, Rationality and the Possibility of Social Science.Danny Frederick - 2013 - Theoria 28 (1):61-75.
Added to index2010-03-04
Total downloads520 ( #2,901 of 2,152,538 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,788 of 2,152,538 )
How can I increase my downloads?