Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):29-68 (2006)
Cosmopolitans argue that the account of human rights and distributive justice in John Rawls's The Law of Peoples is incompatible with his argument for liberal justice. Rawls should extend his account of liberal basic liberties and the guarantees of distributive justice to apply to the world at large. This essay defends Rawls's grounding of political justice in social cooperation. The Law of Peoples is drawn up to provide principles of foreign policy for liberal peoples. Human rights are among the necessary conditions for social cooperation, and so long as a decent people respect human rights, a common good, and the Law of Peoples, it is not the role of liberal peoples to impose upon well-ordered decent peoples liberal liberties they cannot endorse. Moreover, the difference principle is not an allocative or alleviatory principle, but applies to design property and other basic social institutions necessary to economic production, exchange and consumption. It presupposes political cooperation—a legislative body to actively apply it, and a legal system to apply it to. There is no feasible global state or global legal system that could serve these roles. Finally, the difference principle embodies a conception of democratic reciprocity that is only appropriate to cooperation among free and equal citizens who are socially productive and politically autonomous. a Footnotesa I am grateful to K. C. Tan for many helpful discussions and criticisms of this essay. I am also grateful to the other contributors to this volume for their comments, and to Ellen Paul for her many helpful suggestions in preparing the final version of this essay.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
On the Very Idea of Cosmopolitan Justice: Constructivism and International Agency.Saladin Meckled-Garcia - 2008 - Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (3):245-271.
Contemporary Cosmopolitanism: Some Current Issues.Gillian Brock - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (8):689-698.
The Many, Not the Few: Pluralism About Global Distributive Justice.Helena de Bres - 2012 - Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (3):314-340.
Who’s Afraid of a World State? A Global Sovereign and the Statist-Cosmopolitan Debate.Shmuel Nili - 2015 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (3):241-263.
Who's Afraid of a World State? A Global Sovereign and the Statist-Cosmopolitan Debate.Shmuel Nili - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (3):1-23.
Similar books and articles
There Are Peoples and There Are Peoples: A Critique of Rawls' Law of Peoples.Brian E. Butler - 2001 - Florida Philosophical Review 1 (2):1-24.
Rawls on Global Distributive Justice: A Defence.Joseph Heath - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (sup1):193-226.
The Law of Peoples: The Old and the New.Chris Naticchia - 2005 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (3):353-369.
Rawls, Reasonableness, and International Toleration.T. Porter - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (4):382-414.
May Western Rights, by Extension, Become Human Rights?Antonio Pérez-Estévez - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:61-72.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads178 ( #24,490 of 2,154,174 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #90,853 of 2,154,174 )
How can I increase my downloads?