Artistic Enhancement. Literature and Film as Mirror and Means of Human Enhancement

Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica-Aesthetica-Practica 32:71--85 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Human enhancement affects all members of society and is thus closely linked to issues of social justice: up to now, the promises and perils of enhancement are usually only known to, and thus used, by few members of society. This can lead to individual competitive advantages that create or widen social gaps. Broad public information is, therefore, key to ensure that enhancement does not conflict with the principle of equality of opportunities. As possible means of public information, literature and films are able to counter such possible social injustice, which is why they may be allotted a central role in the ethical debates on human enhancement. Two aspects will be considered in this regard: 1) enhancement in art and 2) through art. 1) The extent to which artistic depictions and public information and perceptions of enhancement may be intertwined will be illustrated by two examples where both texts and their accompanying paratexts had a particular bearing on the public debate on enhancement: the film Gattaca of 1997 and the novel Never let me go by Nobel laureate Kazuo Ishiguro. 2) The second part of the paper is dedicated to the question of how far enhancing selected groups of society may contribute to a greater common good and which potentials art can offer in this regard. Three groups of persons will be taken into account: 1) clinical ethics committees, 2) physicians, and 3) patients.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Should we enhance animals?S. Chan - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (11):678-683.
Integration of cognitive and moral enhancement.Vojin Rakic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):91-103.
Enhancement in Sport, and Enhancement outside Sport.Thomas Douglas - 2007 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
The Ethics of Human Enhancement.Alberto Giubilini & Sagar Sanyal - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (4):233-243.
An Argument against Arguments for Enhancement. [REVIEW]Michael J. Selgelid - 2008 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).
Is considerable life extension an enhancement?R. Rantanen - 2014 - Global Bioethics 25 (2):103-113.
Thinking across species—a critical bioethics approach to enhancement.Richard Twine - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (6):509-523.
Is Human Enhancement also a Personal Matter?Vincent Menuz, Thierry Hurlimann & Béatrice Godard - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):161-177.
The perils of moral enhancement.Aleksandar Dobrijevic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):104-110.
Human Enhancement.Eric Juengst & Daniel Moseley - 2016 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-04

Downloads
2 (#1,780,599)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Hot Baths and Cold Minds.John Harris & David R. Lawrence - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (2):123-134.
Reading Literary Fiction as Moral Enhancement.Katharina Fürholzer & Sabine Salloch - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 7 (2):104-106.
The Arts and Sciences of Reading: Humanities in The Laboratory.Lindsey Grubbs - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 7 (2):85-94.

Add more references