David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophers' Imprint 5 (7):1-34 (2005)
In the first Critique, Kant says, “[A]ll the actions of a human being are determined in accord with the order of nature,” adding that “if we could investigate all the appearances . . . there would be no human action we could not predict with certainty.” Most Kantian treatments of human action discuss action from a practical perspective, according to which human beings are transcendentally free, and thus do not sufficiently lay out this Kant’s empirical, causal description of human action. Drawing on Kant’s lectures in empirical psychology and his anthropological writings, this paper offers a clear and detailed elucidation of Kant’s empirical account of human action. After explaining the connection between cognitions, feelings, desires, and actions, I show how the lower faculty of desire is governed by various instincts, inclinations, and propensities, and how the higher faculty of desire is governed by (empirical) character. I also discuss how character and inclinations arise from natural human propensities combined with other empirical causes. By looking at both Kant’s faculty psychology and his account of predispositions, I lay out an overall Kantian framework for explaining any kind of human action.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Paul Katsafanas (2014). Nietzsche and Kant on the Will: Two Models of Reflective Agency. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (1):185-216.
Eric Entrican Wilson (2015). Self‐Legislation and Self‐Command in Kant's Ethics. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (2):256-278.
Patrick Frierson (2008). Empirical Psychology, Common Sense, and Kant's Empirical Markers for Moral Responsibility. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (4):473-482.
Similar books and articles
Rachel Zuckert (2007). Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
Sibylle Rolf (2012). Humanity as an Object of Respect: Immanuel Kant's Anthropological Approach and the Foundation for Morality. Heythrop Journal 53 (4):594-605.
Paul Guyer (ed.) (1992). The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge University Press.
Patrick Frierson (2014). Kant's Empirical Psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Bernd Ludwig (2007). Kant, Garve, and the Motives of Moral Action. Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):183-193.
Patrick Kain (2010). Duties Regarding Animals. In Lara Denis (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press 210--233.
Thomas Sturm (2008). Why Did Kant Reject Physiological Explanations in His Anthropology? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (4):495-505.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads72 ( #66,769 of 1,903,117 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #144,798 of 1,903,117 )
How can I increase my downloads?