Propositional Contingentism
Review of Symbolic Logic 9 (1):123-142 (2016)
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
According to propositional contingentism, it is contingent what propositions there are. This paper presents two ways of modeling contingency in what propositions there are using two classes of possible worlds models. The two classes of models are shown to be equivalent as models of contingency in what propositions there are, although they differ as to which other aspects of reality they represent. These constructions are based on recent work by Robert Stalnaker; the aim of this paper is to explain, expand, and, in one aspect, correct Stalnaker's discussion.
|
| Keywords | Propositions Contingentism Robert Stalnaker |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Reprint years | 2016 |
| DOI | 10.1017/S1755020315000325 |
| Options |
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Higher-Order Contingentism, Part 1: Closure and Generation.Peter Fritz & Jeremy Goodman - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (6):645-695.
Knowledge of Objective Modality.Margot Strohminger & Juhani Yli-Vakkuri - 2018 - Philosophical Studies:1-21.
Logics for Propositional Contingentism.Peter Fritz - 2017 - Review of Symbolic Logic 10 (2):203-236.
Similar books and articles
Higher-Order Contingentism, Part 1: Closure and Generation.Peter Fritz & Jeremy Goodman - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (6):645-695.
An Argument for Temporalism and Contingentism.Caleb Perl - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (5):1387-1417.
Indexical Beliefs and Communication: Against Stalnaker on Self‐Location.Clas Weber - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (3):640-663.
Properties in a Contingentist's Domain.Kristie Miller - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2):225-245.
Possible Worlds and Situations.Robert Stalnaker - 1986 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 15 (1):109 - 123.
How Many Sciences for One World? Contingency and the Success of Science.Emiliano Trizio - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):253-258.
Propositions, What Are They Good For?Stephen Schiffer - 2012 - In Richard Schantz (ed.), Prospects for Meaning (Current Issues in Theoretical Philosophy, Vol. 3). Walter de Gruyter.
What in the World Are the Ways Things Might Have Been? [REVIEW]Jeffrey C. King - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (3):443 - 453.
A Philosophical Conception of Propositional Modal Logic.Edward N. Zalta - 1993 - Philosophical Topics 21 (2):263-281.
De Jure and De Facto Validity in the Logic of Time and Modality.Stephan Leuenberger - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):196-205.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-11-06
Total downloads
157 ( #36,486 of 2,268,105 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #27,654 of 2,268,105 )
2015-11-06
Total downloads
157 ( #36,486 of 2,268,105 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #27,654 of 2,268,105 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Monthly downloads
