Abstract |
This paper makes an in-depth analysis of the nature and role of the measures that follow an acquital by reason of insufficient mental capability, tracking their historical evolution and scrutinizing the question of their legitimacy and limits in democratic states. The conceptual and systematic implications of these measure for the concepts of punishment and crime are also studied.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Methodology to Create Legal Ontologies in a Logic Programming Based Web Information Retrieval System.José Saias & Paulo Quaresma - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (4):397-417.
Will Versus Reason: Truth in Natural Law, Positive Law, and Legal Theory.Brian Bix - 2010 - In Kurt Pritzl (ed.), Truth: Studies of a Robust Presence. Catholic University of America Press.
Uncertain Reasoning About Agents' Beliefs and Reasoning.John A. Barnden - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (2-3):115-152.
Philosophy and the Criminal Law: Principle and Critique.Antony Duff (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
Your Liberty or Your Life: Reciprocity in the Use of Restrictive Measures in Contexts of Contagion. [REVIEW]A. M. Viens, Cécile M. Bensimon & Ross E. G. Upshur - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (2):207-217.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-05-03
Total views
3 ( #1,363,274 of 2,520,778 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,623 of 2,520,778 )
2009-05-03
Total views
3 ( #1,363,274 of 2,520,778 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,623 of 2,520,778 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads