Sentences as Systems: The Principle of Compositionality and Its Limits

In Lucia Urbani Ulivi (ed.), The Systemic Turn in Human and Natural Sciences: A Rock in the Pond. Springer Verlag. pp. 171-184 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter, it is argued on two different grounds that sentences in natural languages can be seen as systems. First, beyond their linear order, sentences exhibit a syntactic hierarchical structure. Therefore, they are structured entities. Although this structure is usually interpreted as independent of meaning, many semanticists believe that syntactic structure indicates the order in which the meanings of the parts are combined. Second, although the principle of compositionality—which states that the meaning of a sentence is a function of the meanings of the parts of that sentence—is valid in general for natural languages, this principle has been shown to have many exceptions, where interpretation does not proceed bottom-up but top-down, from the meaning of the whole to the meaning of the parts. For this reason, a radical version of the principle of compositionality is untenable; if the whole depends on its parts and the parts on the whole, then the sentence is a system that cannot be dissected into separate parts without losing something essential.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Meaning and Compositional Structure.Gary Martin Ebbs - 1988 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
Communication and strong compositionality.Peter Pagin - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (3):287-322.
Is Compositionality a Trivial Principle?Richard Heck - 2013 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 8 (1):140-55.
The Many Faces of Semantic Compositionality.Antonio Zeno Rauti - 2000 - Dissertation, University of California, Riverside
On Compositionality.Martin Jönsson - 2008 - Dissertation, Lund University
Compositionality.Peter Pagin & Dag Westerståhl - 2011 - In Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. pp. 96-123.
Compositionality and Understanding.Fei YuGuo - 2014 - ProtoSociology 31:50-58.
Compositionality is not the problem.Wilfrid Hodges - 1998 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 6:7.
The Myth of Reverse Compositionality.Philip Robbins - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 125 (2):251-275.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-07

Downloads
6 (#1,269,502)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Moving Words.Savina Raynaud - 2020 - Gestalt Theory 42 (1):17-29.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references