Ethics and Behavior 2 (4):245 – 251 (1992)

Abstract
The sensible response to conflicts of interest is impaired by misconceptions and sloppy usage of terminology. Apparent and potential are widely misused modifiers for conflicts. Excessive legislative focus on financial interests limits understanding of the scope and significance of researchers' conflicts of interest. There is no moral or ethical failing in having a conflict of interest; the problem occurs when conflicts are not disclosed appropriately and when conflicts are allowed to bias research, teaching, or practice. Avoidance and prevention should be applied to bias, not conflicts.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1207/s15327019eb0204_2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,259
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Conflict of Interest.Michael Davis - 1982 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 1 (4):17-27.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Impact of Conflict of Interest on Trust in Science.Paul J. Friedman - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):413-420.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
56 ( #204,750 of 2,518,720 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,070 of 2,518,720 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes