Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84 (64):121- (2009)
The current literature on the value of knowledge is marred by two unwarranted presumptions, which together distort the debate and conceal what is perhaps the most basic value of knowledge, as distinct from mere true belief. These presumptions are the Synchronic Presumption, which confines philosophical attention to the present snapshot in time; and the Analytical Presumption, which has people look for the value of knowledge in some kind of warrant. Together these presumptions conceal that the value of knowledge might inhere not in a necessary condition, but simply in a property that most knowledge possesses; and, in particular, that it might inhere, as I argue it does, in a certain property of 'resilience': the tendency to survive misleading counter-evidence over time owing to the subject's being in a position to weight it against evidence already possessed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis.Edward Craig - 1990 - Oxford University Press.
Testimony and the Value of Knowledge.Martin Kusch - 2009 - In Pritchard, Haddock & MIllar (eds.), Epistemic Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 60--94.
``Why Do We Value Knowledge&Quot.Ward E. Jones - 1997 - American Philosophical Quarterly 34:423-440.
Citations of this work BETA
Epistemic Justice as a Condition of Political Freedom?Miranda Fricker - 2013 - Synthese 190 (7):1317-1332.
Expanding Epistemology: A Responsibilist Approach.Guy Axtell - 2008 - Philosophical Papers 37 (1):51-87.
Similar books and articles
Time and the Implicit-Explicit Continuum.Jill Boucher - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):758-759.
Descartes's Language Test for Rationality.Marie I. George - 2009 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (1):107-125.
The Turing Test and the Argument From Analogy for Other Minds.C. Waterman - 1995 - Southwest Philosophy Review 11 (1):15-22.
What Does the Turing Test Really Mean? And How Many Human Beings (Including Turing) Could Pass?Tyler Cowen & Michelle Dawson - unknown -
Knowledge of Action Without Observation.Hanna Pickard - 2004 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (3):203–228.
Are Linguists Better Subjects?Jennifer Culbertson & Steven Gross - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):721-736.
Scepticism and the Genealogy of Knowledge: Situating Epistemology in Time.Miranda Fricker - 2008 - Philosophical Papers 37 (1):27-50.
Added to index2010-07-26
Total downloads82 ( #59,890 of 2,053,879 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #119,851 of 2,053,879 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.